#wall-street-journal

A Federal Judge Threw Out Trump's $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against the Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch, and Dow Jones Over Their Story About a Lewd 2003 Birthday Letter to Jeffrey Epstein Bearing Trump's Name — This Time Dismissing It With Prejudice So It Cannot Be Refiled — and Wrote That the President Was "Grasping at Straws," Calling His Legal Team's Ghislaine Maxwell References a "Red Herring"

On October 31, 2026, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed — for the second time, and this time with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled — Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, its owner Rupert Murdoch, and Dow Jones. The suit targeted the Journal's reporting on a lewd 2003 letter, bearing Trump's name, prepared for Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday, which Trump denies writing. Gayles found that Trump had failed to show the reporting was published with "actual malice" — the demanding constitutional standard a public figure must meet to win a defamation case — and he did not spare the president's lawyering: he wrote that Trump was "grasping at straws," suggested the legal team had tried to manufacture flaws in the Journal's investigation, and dismissed the complaint's references to Ghislaine Maxwell as a "red herring." The judge had already tossed an earlier version in the spring, giving Trump a chance to refile, which he did; this time there is no second chance. Trump says he will appeal. The failure here is twofold: a sitting president using a $10 billion lawsuit to try to punish a newspaper for reporting on his Epstein ties, and a court finding the effort so legally empty that it ended it permanently with a rebuke attached.

Katie Zacharia Is Out as White House Press Secretary After Just Five Days — the Shortest Tenure in the History of the Job, Beating Even Anthony Scaramucci's 11 Days — After the Wall Street Journal Reported She Had Failed the Bar Exam and an Adviser's Question "Did Anyone Vet Her?" Turned Out to Have the Answer "No"; the Real Failure Is Not Her Rough Debut but an Administration That Left the Podium Empty for Six Weeks, Then Installed and Fired a Spokesperson It Had Never Vetted

On October 16, 2026, Katie Zacharia was out as White House press secretary just five days after she started — the shortest tenure anyone has ever had in the role, shorter even than Anthony Scaramucci's famous 11 days in Trump's first-term communications shop. The White House, through communications director Steven Cheung, framed it as a "transition" and said she would continue supporting the president in a new role; CNN, citing multiple advisers, reported it plainly as a firing, with Trump announcing the decision Friday and saying he had urged her to reconsider whether the job was for her. The trigger, per reporting, was not only her widely mocked 14-minute debut briefing but a vetting failure: when an adviser asked "Did anyone vet her?", the answer turned out to be no. The Wall Street Journal reported she had sat for the California bar exam after law school and not passed; Zacharia confirmed she had failed, saying she had been told she could call herself a "lawyer" but not an "attorney." Failing a bar exam is not, by itself, disqualifying for a press job, and a person's hard week does not belong in a record of government failure. What belongs here is the administration's own conduct: it let the briefing room sit dark for roughly six weeks after Karoline Leavitt left, then filled the most visible spokesperson job in the government with someone it had not vetted, put her in front of the country, and fired her five days later. The record-short tenure is not Zacharia's failure. It is the White House's.

Trump Forced Out His Own Ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle — Donald Trump Jr.'s Former Fiancée — After the Wall Street Journal Reported She Had Asked a Trump Donor to Pay Off a Roughly $100,000 Credit-Card Bill Shortly Before Her Confirmation Hearing, Allegedly Promising Him Access to Administration Officials in Return; Trump Said "I Didn't Like What I Read," Guilfoyle Says the Allegations Are False and Vows to Fight Them

On October 13, 2026, the White House announced it had asked Kimberly Guilfoyle — the U.S. ambassador to Greece, a former Fox News host, and the former fiancée of Donald Trump Jr. — to resign. The move followed reporting by the Wall Street Journal that, shortly before her Senate confirmation hearing, Guilfoyle had asked a Trump donor to cover a credit-card bill of roughly $100,000, allegedly promising him access to administration officials in return, and that she had used her political connections to seek financial favors and promote private business interests. Trump confirmed he had pushed her out, saying simply, "I didn't like what I read." The announcement was made, awkwardly, by brand-new press secretary Katie Zacharia at the 14-minute debut briefing this archive has already documented — "We have asked Ambassador Guilfoyle to resign" — making it one of the few pieces of real news that curated session surfaced. Guilfoyle denies all of it: "These allegations are false, and I intend to vigorously defend my name, my reputation, and my integrity." The allegations are, for now, unproven and contested, and that caveat is real. But the core of what forced her out is a textbook corruption concern — a nominee for a U.S. ambassadorship allegedly trading the access her office would command for someone else to pay her personal debts — and it lands on an administration that treats ambassadorships as rewards for loyalty and family ties rather than qualifications.

Trump's Ban of CNN Backfired Into a Rare Show of Press Solidarity: The Five Networks in the White House TV Pool — Fox News Among Them — Refused to Replace CNN and Suspended Televised Pool Coverage of the President Rather Than Help Him Sideline It, Leaving Him Without Independent TV Coverage on the Eve of His U.N. Trip While CNN, MS NOW, and Politico Sue Over the First Amendment

On Monday, September 21, 2026, the White House television press pool suspended its coverage of Donald Trump — a rare, coordinated act of protest against his ban of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico three days earlier. The pool is the five-network consortium (ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News, and CNN) that takes turns covering the president's events on behalf of all outlets. CNN was scheduled to run Monday's pool coverage and accompany Trump to New York for the United Nations General Assembly; when the White House barred CNN from performing that duty, the other networks refused to replace it. Fox News' Washington bureau chief Bryan Boughton — the acting chair of the TV pool consortium — announced that "the TV pool will not be covering events designated as pool coverage of the President," and that "there will be no replacement pool." That Fox, Trump's friendliest network, stood with CNN rather than help the White House route around the ban is the most striking part. All five networks issued a joint statement: "The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government. No administration should restrict a news organization because it objects to its reporting." CNN, MS NOW, and Politico announced they are filing a First Amendment lawsuit. Trump set out to punish outlets whose coverage he dislikes; he ended up with no independent TV pool coverage of himself on the way to address the world, a unified press corps rebuking him, and a lawsuit — an own-goal on top of an abuse.

For His "State of the Force" Address, Defense Secretary Hegseth Had the Pentagon Ask Commanders to Send Only Fit, Top-Performing, "Impeccably Groomed" Troops — Screening His Own Audience by Appearance So the Cameras Would Show a Flawless Military Behind Him, With the Chosen Few Offered a Workout With Him — While the Force He Actually Runs Is Mired in an Unwinnable War, a Recruiting Crisis, and Leadership He Purged

According to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon asked military commanders to hand-pick the service members allowed to attend Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's September 30 "State of the Force" address — and the criteria were about appearance as much as anything. One email to Army commanders said potential attendees had to pass the Army fitness test and meet its waist-to-height ratio while maintaining "impeccable grooming and uniform standards (no exception)." The Pentagon also wanted troops "consistently rated as top performers" with "a clear record of integrity, discipline and selfless service," and selected attendees were offered the chance to work out with Hegseth. In other words, the Secretary of Defense curated his own audience by how the troops would look on camera behind him. Physical standards are a real part of military readiness, and a defense secretary is entitled to care about them. But screening who may sit in the room for a speech — by grooming, waistline, and photogenic performance record — is not readiness; it is set-dressing. It is the instinct of a former television host staging a backdrop, applied to a military that is, at this moment, bogged down in a nearly seven-month war its own generals call unwinnable, short thousands of troops it cannot recruit, and missing senior leaders Hegseth himself pushed out. He is arranging the extras while the production burns.

The DOJ Sent Federal Agents to the Homes of Four New York Times Reporters With Grand-Jury Subpoenas — for Reporting That Trump's Qatari Air Force One Lacks Missile Defenses and That the Secret Service Told Him Not to Fly It — and the Prosecutor Who Issued Them Is Trump's Nominee to Run National Intelligence

The Justice Department subpoenaed four New York Times journalists — Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, and Eric Schmitt — ordering them before a Manhattan federal grand jury "in regard to an alleged violation of criminal law." Federal agents delivered some of the subpoenas to the reporters' homes. Their offense: reporting that the Secret Service urged Trump to leave the NATO summit in Turkey aboard the old Air Force One rather than the Qatari-gifted Boeing 747, and that the gifted jet lacks "defensive countermeasures that were security features of the old model, including its advanced antimissile capabilities." The subpoenas were issued by Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan — who is himself Trump's nominee to become Director of National Intelligence, with a confirmation hearing days away — and followed a White House meeting involving FBI Director Kash Patel. The Times said it will fight the order. Its newsroom lawyer David McCraw said federal agents on reporters' doorsteps "should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects." The National Press Club called it "an extraordinary assault on the freedom of the press that strikes at the heart of the First Amendment." The DOJ claimed "reporters are not the targets, those leaking classified information are." The move fits a pattern: the department earlier issued then withdrew similar subpoenas against Washington Post and Wall Street Journal reporters, the FBI searched a Post reporter's home in January, and in April 2025 AG Pam Bondi rescinded the Biden-era policy that shielded journalists' records in leak investigations. The reporting being criminalized is the same reporting documented here days ago — that the $400M+ rushed retrofit produced a plane one analyst said was suited to "domestic hops rather than hostile skies."

Trump Handed His Acting AG a Stack of News Articles with "Treason" Written in Sharpie — The DOJ Then Tried to Drag Post and Journal Reporters Before a Grand Jury, and Backed Down

The Washington Post reported on June 23, 2026, that Trump's Justice Department issued grand jury subpoenas this spring to compel reporters from The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal to testify under oath in a leak investigation — then withdrew them earlier this month after the two newsrooms challenged them in a secret legal fight in the Eastern District of Virginia. The targets were Post national security reporter Ellen Nakashima and three unnamed Wall Street Journal reporters. CNN reported that Trump personally pushed acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to issue the subpoenas, handing him a stack of printed articles with the word "Treason" written across them in Sharpie. The leak hunt was driven by Trump's anger over carefully sourced stories warning of the risks of attacking Iran — stories that turned out to be prescient. Compelling a journalist to reveal sources before a grand jury is extraordinarily rare; the National Press Club called it "one of the most aggressive actions against a free and independent press in recent memory." It followed a deliberate dismantling of press protections: in April, AG Pam Bondi rescinded the Biden-era policy shielding reporters' records, and in January the FBI searched the home of Post reporter Hannah Natanson and seized her devices. No reporter testified — but the DOJ offered no explanation for the withdrawal, leaving open whether the subpoenas will simply be reissued.

Trump Plots to "Expunge" Both Impeachments from the Record — Constitutional Scholars: "You Cannot Un-Ring a Bell"

The Wall Street Journal reports Trump and allies are pushing a House resolution to expunge both impeachments — for abusing power to pressure Ukraine and for inciting the January 6 insurrection. Trump: "It should be done because I did nothing wrong. It was a rigged deal." Speaker Johnson: "I think it makes a lot of sense." Constitutional scholars say the Constitution contains no mechanism to undo an impeachment. Georgetown's Jonathan Turley: "It is not like a constitutional DUI. Once you are impeached, you are impeached." Hofstra's James Sample: "You cannot un-ring a bell." Rep. Darrell Issa introduced a resolution in April; Rep. Anna Paulina Luna announced another. GOP lawmakers privately say it won't be considered until after the midterms — because rehashing Trump's conduct would hurt them. Schiff: "There is no expunging the stain." Raskin: "There is a very easy way to not get impeached: stop committing impeachable offenses."