#peoples-house
3 entries with this tag
The Deputy White House Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, Posted an AI-Generated Fantasy of Himself, Eric and Lara Trump, and an Elon Musk Cameo Spraying Champagne on a Gold Luggage Cart Through the White House to Pitbull's "Don't Stop the Party" — a "Let Them Eat Cake" Spectacle So Tone-Deaf, With Americans Unable to Afford Groceries and Gas, That Even Prominent Conservatives Called It a Gift to Democrats Before the Midterms
Late on September 26, 2026, Dan Scavino — the deputy White House chief of staff and one of Trump's longest-serving aides — posted an AI-generated video depicting a lavish after-party for the state dinner Trump had just hosted for Chinese President Xi Jinping. In the clip, Scavino, in a tuxedo, sprays champagne while riding a gilded luggage cart through the White House alongside his wife and Eric and Lara Trump, set to Pitbull's "Don't Stop the Party"; it opens with Elon Musk flipping through party photos, including one of Trump galloping through the White House on horseback, before the president himself strolls into frame. It was meant as a celebratory flex. It was received as "let them eat cake." The backlash was bipartisan, and the sharpest cuts came from the right: conservatives noted that Americans are struggling to afford groceries, gas, and mortgage payments while the "People's House" is depicted as a confetti-strewn champagne bash. Carrie Prejean Boller called it "tone deaf"; The Dispatch's Jonah Goldberg sneered that it was "precisely the midterm messaging the GOP needs from the Deputy White House Chief of Staff." With the Republican Party trying to make affordability its central pitch before November, a top White House official published a fantasy of gilded opulence — and handed the other side the image for free.
The Full Supreme Court, 5-4, Let Trump Keep Building His White House Ballroom Indefinitely — but Ducked the Actual Question of Whether He Can Demolish the People's House Without Congress, Ruling Only That the Preservation Group Suing Him Probably Lacks Standing; in a Striking Split, Chief Justice Roberts Joined the Three Liberals in Dissent, Writing That the Construction Is "Likely Unlawful"
On August 31, 2026, the full Supreme Court — going beyond Chief Justice Roberts's individual interim stay ten days earlier — ruled 5-4 that Trump may continue building his White House ballroom on the site of the demolished East Wing, indefinitely, while litigation continues. But the Court did not decide the question the case actually raises: whether a president can tear down and rebuild part of the White House without congressional approval. Instead, the unsigned majority ducked the merits on a technicality, holding that the National Trust for Historic Preservation likely lacks legal standing to sue at all. The lineup was unusual and revealing. The five justices in the majority were all conservatives, including Trump's three appointees. Chief Justice John Roberts — who had granted the temporary stay on August 21 — crossed over to join the Court's three liberals in dissent, writing that construction has now "proceeded for the better part of a year" and is "likely unlawful." That is the Chief Justice of the United States saying, on the record, that the president is probably breaking the law, and that five of his colleagues just cleared the way for him to finish doing it. The ballroom will be built. Whether he had the power to build it is a question the Court arranged never to have to answer.
A Week After Two Courts Ruled He Was Demolishing the People's House Without the Authority to Do It, Trump Got What He Wanted From the Supreme Court: Chief Justice Roberts Issued a Stay Letting Construction of His $400 Million East Wing Ballroom Keep Going — Overriding, For Now, the Judges Who Said a President Cannot Tear Down and Rebuild the White House Without Congress
On August 21, 2026, Chief Justice John Roberts granted a temporary stay allowing Trump to continue building his 90,000-square-foot, $400-million-plus ballroom on the site of the demolished White House East Wing — putting on hold, for now, the lower-court rulings that had ordered the aboveground work stopped. The legal challenge, brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, argues that the president had no authority to unilaterally demolish part of the White House and erect a massive new structure without congressional approval. A federal district court agreed, finding Trump exceeded his authority, and a divided appeals court affirmed it earlier in August. Rather than go to Congress — the branch the Constitution actually charges with funding and authorizing such things — the administration ran to the Supreme Court's shadow docket, and Roberts, handling the emergency application, blocked the lower courts' order while the justices decide what to do next. The stay is provisional and procedural, not a ruling that the demolition was lawful. But its practical effect is immediate and hard to reverse: the bulldozers and cranes keep working while the courts deliberate, and every day of construction makes the finding that he never had the authority harder to give any teeth. This is the next beat in a saga the archive has tracked from the first judge's order ("the President is not the owner") through the DOJ's shadow-docket gambit — a president reshaping the nation's most symbolic public building on his own say-so, and the courts, so far, letting him.