#marjorie-taylor-greene

Five Weeks Before the Midterms, a Migrant Caravan Appeared Right on Schedule — and Trump's DHS and White House Sounded "Ominous Warnings" About the Few Hundred People Walking Through Mexico, Even as the Administration Simultaneously Boasts That the Border Is "the Most Secure in History" With "16 Months of Zero Releases"; the Contradiction Was Called Out Not Only by the Left but by Former Trump Loyalist Marjorie Taylor Greene: "The GOP Needs to Scare You Into Voting Because Nothing Else Is Working"

In late September 2026, roughly five weeks before the midterm elections, a migrant caravan — the "Faith and Hope" group of a few hundred people, mostly Hondurans and other Central Americans — set out from San Pedro Sula, Honduras, and began the long walk north through Mexico. The Trump administration responded as if an invasion were imminent: the Department of Homeland Security issued "ominous warnings," and the White House declared, "The message to the caravan is you will not be allowed into our country." Here is the contradiction that gives the game away. The same administration insists, constantly, that Trump has delivered "the most secure border in history" — 16 straight months of "zero releases," border crossings 94% below the Biden-era average, the lowest apprehensions on record. If all of that is true, a caravan of a few hundred exhausted people on foot, a thousand miles away, is not a threat; it is a non-event that the administration's own airtight border would stop cold. Sounding alarms about it anyway, precisely as ballots are about to be cast, is not border security. It is the oldest trick in the Republican midterm playbook — and this time it was named, bluntly, by one of the movement's own: former Trump loyalist Marjorie Taylor Greene, who wrote, "We have not seen a caravan headed to the U.S. southern border in several years, why now? Oh yeah, there is an election coming and the GOP needs to scare you into voting because nothing else is working."

At His Half-Empty Dallas Convention, Trump Promised to Send Every Adult American Citizen a $5,000 "Dividend" — but Only If Republicans Win Both the House and the Senate in November: a Trillion-Dollar-Plus Offer With No Funding Plan, Framed as an Explicit "Elect My Party and I'll Pay You," From the Same President Whose Earlier $2,000 "Tariff Dividend" Checks Were Promised and Never Arrived

On September 9, 2026, in his keynote at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Trump promised to pay every adult U.S. citizen a $5,000 "dividend" — on the express condition that Republicans win both the House and the Senate in November. His words: "If the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them ... I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000." He branded it the "Trump dividend" and added a caveat that the money must be spent domestically, "not in other nations such as Canada, Germany or China." The offer drew immediate accusations that it amounts to a bribe: a president dangling a cash payment to the entire electorate, contingent on his party winning the election. Two facts make it worse. First, it is almost certainly undeliverable as described — economists put the cost at over $1.2 trillion, there is no funding mechanism, and any such payout would require congressional approval that even Republicans have been reluctant to give. Second, Trump has done this before and not delivered: his 2025 promise of $2,000 "tariff dividend" checks by mid-2026 never materialized, with prediction markets ultimately giving it about a 3% chance. The $5,000 version is more than twice as large, funded by nothing more specific than "our tremendous economic success" — a success contradicted by the record gas prices, trade war, and inflation documented across this archive. It is a promise engineered to move votes, unlikely to be kept, offered to a half-empty arena the party's own candidates avoided.

Trump Plots to "Expunge" Both Impeachments from the Record — Constitutional Scholars: "You Cannot Un-Ring a Bell"

The Wall Street Journal reports Trump and allies are pushing a House resolution to expunge both impeachments — for abusing power to pressure Ukraine and for inciting the January 6 insurrection. Trump: "It should be done because I did nothing wrong. It was a rigged deal." Speaker Johnson: "I think it makes a lot of sense." Constitutional scholars say the Constitution contains no mechanism to undo an impeachment. Georgetown's Jonathan Turley: "It is not like a constitutional DUI. Once you are impeached, you are impeached." Hofstra's James Sample: "You cannot un-ring a bell." Rep. Darrell Issa introduced a resolution in April; Rep. Anna Paulina Luna announced another. GOP lawmakers privately say it won't be considered until after the midterms — because rehashing Trump's conduct would hurt them. Schiff: "There is no expunging the stain." Raskin: "There is a very easy way to not get impeached: stop committing impeachable offenses."