#house — Trump Fail

Trump Spent the Year Insisting the 2026 Midterms Were a Referendum on Himself — and the Voters Answered by Flipping Both the House and the Senate to the Democrats, Who Won at Least 259 House Seats and a Senate Majority, Even Taking a Texas Senate Seat for the First Time in Over Three Decades; Having Said on Election Night He Was "Absolutely Willing to Accept Those Results," Trump Spent the Weekend Calling the Outcome a "Giant Step Back in History" and Asking "How Could the Polls Be So Wrong?"

In the November 3, 2026 midterm elections, the voters delivered the clearest possible verdict on the administration this archive documents: Democrats flipped both chambers of Congress, winning control of the House (projected at least 259 seats) and the Senate (projected at least 54), and even captured a Texas Senate seat for the first time in over three decades. The defeat was especially pointed because Trump had spent the year framing the midterms as a referendum on himself — nationalizing the races, campaigning relentlessly, and telling candidates to run on his record — even as many of them tried to keep their distance. On election night, to his credit, Trump told the New York Times he was "absolutely willing to accept those results." That posture did not last the week. By Sunday he was posting on Truth Social that America had taken a "giant step back in History with the results of the last Election," demanding to know "How could the Polls be so wrong???" and insisting the outcome was not a hit on him. The whiplash is the story: a president who spent months priming the ground to dispute an unfavorable result — refusing to rule out the Insurrection Act, saying he would honor the results only "if they're honest," attacking mail voting and voter rolls — lost decisively, briefly accepted it, then reverted to disparaging the voters' judgment rather than absorbing it. The sweep is the accountability this archive exists to document; the reaction is the same refusal to be accountable that produced the archive in the first place.

For the Second Time, the House Formally Voted to Order Trump to End His War in Iran — 214-208, With Four Republicans Crossing the Aisle — Because Congress Never Authorized the War, Troops Are Dying in It, and He Ignored the Last Resolution Telling Him to Stop

On July 23, 2026, the House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution, 214-208, directing President Trump to "remove the use of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran." It was sponsored by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), and four Republicans — Thomas Massie (KY), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), Warren Davidson (OH), and Tom Barrett (MI) — crossed the aisle to support it. It was the House's fifth vote on a measure to rein in Trump's Iran military actions, and only the second time it has successfully adopted one. The vote came days after four U.S. service members were killed in the Middle East and weeks after the ceasefire and memorandum of understanding Trump paraded as a triumph collapsed — he declared the MOU "over" and, on July 10, formally notified Congress that fighting had resumed. Congress never authorized this war; there is no AUMF for Iran, and under the Constitution the power to take the country to war belongs to the legislature. Jayapal called it "a big victory for the vast majority of the American people who want President Trump to end this illegal war," saying the House was "reasserting our authority over war." The Senate was set to vote the same day on a companion resolution from Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD). But the resolution is a concurrent measure that does not go to the president for signature and cannot, by itself, force him to withdraw — the same kind Congress passed in June, which Trump simply ignored as he restarted the war. The vote is a genuine bipartisan rebuke and a real constitutional assertion. It is also a portrait of a broken check: the branch the Constitution entrusts with the power of war telling the president to stop, twice, while he wages on.