#election-interference
4 entries with this tag
Three Weeks Before the Midterms, Trump's Justice Department Handed California a Password-Protected Thumb Drive of More Than 20,000 Voters and Demanded Officials Verify Their Citizenship Within 48 Hours — Then Sued the State for Not Doing the Impossible, Even as the DOJ's Own Lawsuit Conceded That Investigating That Many People Before Election Day Was Too Much Even for the Federal Government
In mid-October 2026, with the midterm elections roughly three weeks away, the Trump Justice Department escalated a fight over California's voter rolls into something close to a manufactured crisis. On October 13, Acting Deputy Attorney General R. Trent McCotter sent letters to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar Dean Logan, handing Logan a password-protected thumb drive listing more than 20,000 voters compiled from federal agency data and demanding that officials verify every one of their citizenship within 48 hours — and "segregate" those voters' vote-by-mail ballots until it was done. When California did not perform that impossible audit on command, the DOJ sued the state on October 15. The tell was buried in the DOJ's own filing, which acknowledged that investigating that many people before Election Day would be too much even for the federal government — an admission that the 48-hour demand it was suing over was never achievable. Weber called it "an emergency of the DOJ's creation." The pattern is familiar and alarming: similar federally generated "noncitizen voter" lists have proven inaccurate before in Nevada, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. Using the Justice Department to cast last-minute doubt on a blue state's rolls — on a timetable the DOJ itself admits is impossible — is not election integrity. It is election interference dressed as it.
Asked Directly Whether He Would Rule Out Invoking the Insurrection Act — the Law Letting a President Deploy the Military Against Americans on U.S. Soil — or Declaring a National Emergency Around the November Midterms, Trump Said, "I Don't Rule Anything Out or In. I Could Use It. A Lot of People Think I Should Use It Sometimes" — as His Administration Surges Troops and Agents Into Democratic-Run Cities
In an interview with Time published October 1, 2026, with the midterm elections a month away, Trump was asked whether he would rule out invoking the Insurrection Act or declaring a national emergency around the vote. His answer was a refusal to foreclose it: "I don't rule anything out or in. I could use it. A lot of people think I should use it sometimes." Asked more broadly about the limits of his power, he said, "I'm not committing to anything," and, "We're going to see how it plays out in court." The Insurrection Act is the statute that allows a president to deploy the U.S. military to enforce the law domestically — against Americans, on American streets. For a president to decline to rule out using it, or an emergency declaration, specifically "around the midterms" is not a neutral statement of legal fact. It is a threat left deliberately on the table, and it lands in a context this archive has documented: an administration that has surged National Guard troops and federal agents into Democratic-run cities on crime and immigration pretexts, that has spent a year attacking mail voting and voter rolls, and whose critics — including some on the right — have warned of a design to shape or contest the election. Time also reported that White House advisers have already war-gamed how to respond if Democrats win the House or Senate. A president confident of a fair contest does not muse about soldiers around it. This one would not say he wouldn't.
Trump's Multi-Front Assault on How Americans Vote — a Mail-Ballot Executive Order, a Bid for a National Voter Database, Citizenship-Document Demands, and a Rushed USPS System That Could Reject Ballots in Bulk — Has Run Into a Wall of Public Rejection: Mail Voting Is Popular Across Both Parties, Voters Tell Pollsters His Fraud Claims Are "BS," and His Broader Power Grab Drew One of the Largest Protest Days in American History
Trump has spent 2026 waging a coordinated campaign against how Americans vote — an executive order directing the Postal Service to restrict mail ballots, an effort to compile a national database of voters' private data, demands that registrants produce documents like birth certificates and passports, and, as a whistleblower recently revealed, a rushed USPS system that could reject entire batches of ballots. The stated rationale is "election integrity" and the specter of noncitizen voting. The problem for Trump is that Americans are not buying it, and the backlash has been broad and measurable. Mail and early voting are popular across party lines — Pew found 60% of Americans, including 37% of Republicans, believe people should be able to vote early or absentee without an excuse. CNN's chief data analyst, Harry Enten, summarized the polling bluntly: voters feel Trump is "full of it. Full of BS" on mail voting, the attacks "aren't sticking," and he'd be better off moving on. The rejection extends beyond surveys: the "No Kings" mobilization against Trump's imperial turn filled all 50 states with more than 3,300 events, among the largest single-day protests in U.S. history, and roughly 43% of registered voters say they support it, while a Navigator poll found 52% of Americans describe the federal government as "authoritarian." The through-line is that Trump is attacking a voting method his own voters like, on a fraud premise the evidence does not support, and the public — in polls and in the streets — is pushing back.
Helsinki: Sided with Putin Over U.S. Intelligence
Standing next to Vladimir Putin, Trump publicly sided with Russia's denial of election interference over the unanimous assessment of U.S. intelligence agencies — days after 12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for hacking.