#content-based-retaliation

1 entry with this tag

Constitutional Violations

ABC and Disney Went on the Offensive Against Trump's FCC — Suing in Federal Court and Alleging the Agency Waged a "Retaliatory Campaign" Against the Network, Ordering an Early Review of All Eight of Its Station Licenses Years Ahead of Schedule, to Punish It for Jimmy Kimmel's Jokes, "The View," and Its News Coverage

On August 18, 2026, the Walt Disney Company and ABC — along with the eight ABC-owned stations whose licenses are at stake — sued the Federal Communications Commission in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., alleging a First Amendment violation. Their claim is blunt: the FCC "has waged a retaliatory campaign against ABC for a single reason: it disapproves of what ABC broadcasts." The trigger was the FCC, under Trump ally and chairman Brendan Carr, ordering in April an "early" review of all eight ABC-owned station licenses — years before they are set to expire — nominally citing the company's diversity practices, but (per the suit) actually to punish ABC for its news coverage, the talk show "The View," and late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who relentlessly mocks Trump. The lawsuit cites Trump's own social-media posts attacking all three, and his repeated public demands that ABC be stripped of its licenses. Two clarifications matter: this is a suit against Trump's FCC, not against Trump personally, and no court has ruled yet — the "win" that preceded it was Kimmel's reinstatement after he was pushed off the air under FCC pressure. What ABC has done now is take the government's retaliation for constitutionally protected speech and force it into open court, where using broadcast-license power to punish a network for its content is exactly what the First Amendment forbids.