#contempt

A Federal Judge Ordered the Trump Administration to Immediately Stop the Taxpayer-Funded TV Ads Starring the President — Ruling That DHS Had Likely Broken the Law by Diverting $20 Million Congress Appropriated for Immigration Enforcement Into Spots Touting Trump's Record Less Than a Month Before the Midterms — and the Administration Kept Airing Them Anyway, Drawing a Contempt Hearing

On October 11, 2026, U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon issued a temporary restraining order forcing the Trump administration to immediately halt the taxpayer-funded television ads featuring President Trump — the DHS-run campaign this archive has already documented. The ruling was blunt about why: DHS had taken $20 million that Congress appropriated for immigration enforcement and spent it on ads that, in the judge's words, "misappropriated government funds," touting the president's record less than a month before the midterm elections. The suit was brought by a coalition including Common Cause and SEIU Local 32BJ, represented by the legal group Democracy Forward; the Democratic National Committee filed its own parallel suit the same day. Rochon ordered DHS to stop producing and distributing the ads, to cancel television slots already reserved, and barred new or expanded ad agreements for the 14-day life of the order, finding the government had no good legal defense. Then the administration kept some of the ads running after the order, blaming "email delays," and the court set a hearing to decide whether it had violated the injunction. Using public money appropriated for one purpose to run campaign-style ads for the president is a straightforward abuse; being ordered to stop and continuing anyway is contempt of a court's authority on top of it.