#background-checks — Trump Fail

Called Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI Director Kash Patel Defended Dropping Bestiality as an Automatic Disqualifier for Agents by Claiming It Was Meant to Protect Trafficking Victims "Forced" Into Such Acts — an Explanation That Drew Bipartisan Disbelief, Turned an FBI Oversight Hearing Into an Extended Exchange About Bestiality, and That a Republican Senator Couldn't Follow: "Why Would You Even Get Into Bestiality?"

At a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on September 15, 2026, FBI Director Kash Patel was pressed on the bureau's spring guidance that removed bestiality and prostitution as automatic disqualifiers for job applicants — a change this archive documented as part of a broader loosening of FBI hiring standards amid a self-inflicted staffing crisis. Patel's defense was that the change existed to protect victims: "We did not want to punish victims of bestiality, victims who were trafficked," he said, arguing the FBI should not automatically bar someone from consideration "if you are a victim of these awful heinous acts," and claiming some former trafficking victims had been disqualified because they were forced into bestiality. The explanation satisfied almost no one. Senators of both parties zeroed in on the strange framing of "victims of bestiality," and Republican Sen. John Kennedy asked the obvious question — why the FBI would "even get into bestiality" at all. Patel conceded that skepticism had been his own initial reaction when subordinates proposed the policy. There is a narrow, legitimate point buried in his answer: a person coerced by traffickers into a sexual act is a victim, not a criminal, and should not be treated as one. But that narrow point does not explain a policy that broadly removed bestiality, prostitution, and theft as automatic disqualifiers for everyone "depending on circumstances." A sympathetic-sounding rationale was retrofitted onto a recruitment-driven rollback of the FBI's integrity standards — and defended so clumsily that it turned a hearing about the nation's premier law-enforcement agency into a spectacle about bestiality.

To Refill an FBI Hollowed Out by His Own Purges, Director Kash Patel Quietly Loosened the Bureau's Background Standards — So That Paying for Sex, Stealing From an Employer, and Even Bestiality or Animal Cruelty Are No Longer Automatic Disqualifiers for Would-Be Agents — All While Publicly Insisting, Against the Documented Rule Changes, That He Is "Not Reducing Our Standards" but "Making It Harder"

The FBI — the nation's premier law-enforcement agency, whose job is to investigate crime — has quietly loosened its hiring standards so that people who committed certain crimes and serious misconduct can now become agents. According to reporting, under changes made in June 2026, a range of conduct that was once an automatic disqualifier is no longer one: applicants who paid for a prostitute may still be eligible if it was more than 10 years ago and happened fewer than three times; stealing from an employer is survivable if it was more than three years ago; and bestiality or animal cruelty no longer disqualifies if it occurred before the applicant turned 18. The bureau has also moved to reduce vetting for some applicants and to fast-track existing support staff into the special-agent academy without the interview and writing assessment previously required. The reason is a staffing crisis — roughly 1,139 special agents left in 2025 alone — but that crisis is largely self-inflicted: Director Kash Patel, Trump's hand-picked FBI chief, helped drive agents out through a wave of purges, firings, and resignations targeting those tied to January 6 and Trump-related investigations. Having hollowed out the workforce, he is now lowering the bar to refill it — while flatly denying he is doing so, insisting "we're not reducing our standards — we're actually making it harder." The documented rule changes say otherwise.